Saturday 7 May 2011

What is it meant by competitiveness and why is a lack of competitiveness seen as a problem?

The term competitiveness is used in describing when two or more firms or economies compete against each other. To have high competitiveness they should all be able to produce their products at roughly the same price including export cost. This means consumers will get a larger range of companies to buy from and lower price as the competition will force the overall price down. So if there were only a few firms in a market there would be a lack of competitiveness so the price of products will not be as low for the consumers as they should be.

If an economy were to become less competitive in a market then this would cause major problems. The first would be increased unemployment, as firms will have to close down, as they can no longer sell their own products because other firms can sell them for much cheaper. It would also mean that there would be deterioration in the Balance of Payments as the economy will import more and export less. This will usually be because there is a decrease in productivity, meaning industry will produce less with higher cost so will become less competitive.

3 comments:

  1. "To have high competitiveness they should all be able to produce their products at roughly the same price including export cost. "

    Private education costs £000s.

    State sector is free.

    Pupils from State and Private go to university - so, given the price difference, why do people go to public schools such as Radley?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Although private education costs thousands, if you look at figures it will show that the chances of them achieving A-C in GCE/A-level is higher than state schools and if you come from a wealthy family, the importance of increased chances would be worth the money as it would be a minimal percent of their disposable income. Overall they value the oppertunity cost of higher chances in going to university more than the increased disposable income they would have from it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I thought universities positively discriminated against public schools?

    ReplyDelete